Does the Online Media Encourage Public Shaming?
If youāve been anywhere online this past week ā and even if you
havenāt ā you probably noticed that some hashtag chats got a little out
of control, most notably the #AskELJames chat.
The chat, which was presented as a way for fans to talk with ā50
Shades of Greyā author EL James about her latest book, was mostly
populated by people who didnāt enjoy Jamesā writing or the subject
matter of her books.
Now, before we go any further, letās make one thing clear: This
discussion is not about EL James writing ability or the subject matter
of her books. Weāre not going to bash any authors here or discuss why
anyone feels the treatment she received is justified.That is all besides
the point.
Instead, Iād like to talk about how the media portrayed the event.
Is Public Shaming Really āBeautifulā and āHilarious?ā
I saw a bit of the #AskELJames hashtag chat
going down live and it wasnāt my cup of tea. I donāt enjoy online
negativity and always feel for the person on the receiving end. I didnāt
think the tweets were very funny because they were mocking EL James,
but that is also just my opinion.
With this particular Twitter chat, participants were questioning Jamesā writing skills, making claims about her books, and calling her some very foul names.
While I donāt approve of or enjoy this sort of behavior, I mostly
ignore it because this is the Internet and there are always going to be
people who are unkind online.
However, when I started reading reports from blogs and online magazines, I couldnāt stay silent.
Everyone from Mashable to People
were reporting on the chat and highlighting some of the tweets. This
isnāt terrible in and of itself, but I found the way some blogs were
reporting on the hashtag chat to be disturbing.
While many people viewed the majority of tweets as witty and clever,
it didnāt escape me that the majority of the highlighted tweets that
were being reported by the blogs were shaming the author.
Even worse, I was taken aback by how many blogs were taking pleasure in seeing EL James publicly shamed on Twitter.
Letās look at some headlines:
From The Mary Sue:
From Hollywood Life:
From The Loop:
From Thought Catalog:
From Radio.com:
From Oh No They Didnāt:
From Daily Planet:
From Fennec & Friends:
From Newsgram:
From G.Q:
From Augustman.com:
Does Sharing āMean Tweetsā Encourage Online Nastiness and Public Shaming?
I shared the screenshots from the above referenced blogs because I
wonder if itās responsible to portray something negative as positive or
humorous. Regardless of whether or not people were amused by the
tweets, the goal with them is the same: public shaming.
If you look at the tweets that were highlighted on the different
blogs that reported on the hashtags, almost all of them called Jamesā
writing ability into play. Funny or not, they werenāt meant to be kind.
This isnāt the first time an online outlet reported āfunny tweetsā
that werenāt directed towards someone in a positive manner. So, I
wonderā¦does knowing that the media might highlight mean tweets encourage
a mean response?
Do people call out famous people in an unkind way in order to receive retweets and perhaps a mention on a blog?
What is the mediaās responsibility when anyone ā famous or not ā has a negative encounter online.
Finally, when it comes to public shaming, are headlines such as those mentioned above part of the problem?
Itās certainly worth thinking about.